Circle website

Critical Raw Materials for
Ireland's Economic Future

Identifying resource vulnerabilities and opportunities through advanced
criticality assessment methodologies

Critical Raw Materials for Ireland 2023

Understanding the criticality of raw materials is essential for Ireland’s economic security and industrial strategy. Our comprehensive analysis reveals that 18 out of 42 assessed materials are deemed critical based on economic importance and supply risk factors.

Our Research Approach

Using a threshold-based assessment method (Method I), materials are classified as critical when they exceed both Economic Importance (EI ≥ 0.4) and Supply Risk (SR ≥ 1.0) thresholds. This analysis highlights several materials of particular concern:

Tungsten

Essential for hardened steel manufacturing, electronics, and aerospace applications.

0.73

Economic Importance
2.67

Supply Risk

Cobalt

Critical for battery technology, particularly in electric vehicles and renewable energy storage.

0.73

Economic Importance
2.67

Supply Risk

Tellurium

Used in solar panels, electronics, & thermoelectric devices for sustainable technologies.

1.46

Economic Importance
1.66

Supply Risk

The materials analysis highlights concerning supply risks for many materials critical to Ireland’s economic development, particularly in renewable energy, electronics, and advanced manufacturing sectors.

Three Methods for Evaluating
Material Criticality

Our research employs three complementary methods to evaluate the criticality of
raw materials for Ireland’s economy, providing a robust framework for policy
decisions and industry planning.

Method I:

Threshold-Based Analysis

This method employs clear thresholds for Economic Importance (EI ≥ 0.4) and Supply Risk (SR ≥ 1.0). Materials exceeding both thresholds are classified as critical. While straightforward, this binary classification may oversimplify the nuanced nature of material criticality.

Method II:

Categorical Criticality Assessment

High criticality: Materials exceeding both EI and SR thresholds (18 materials).
Elevated criticality: Materials exceeding one threshold but not both (16 materials).
Low criticality: Materials below both thresholds (8 materials).

Method III:

Ranking by Combined Metrics

The third method ranks materials based on the sum of their Economic Importance and Supply Risk values, providing a clear prioritization from most to least critical. Tungsten, Tantalum, Silver, Cobalt, and Niobium emerge as the top five most critical materials for Ireland’s economy…

Our Research Approach

Policy Implications and Future Outlook

Our analysis of critical raw materials has significant implications for Ireland’s economic planning, industry development, and international trade relationships.

Key Findings and Recommendations

The identification of 18 critical materials highlights vulnerabilities in Ireland’s supply chains, particularly for materials essential to clean energy technologies, electronics, and advanced manufacturing. Based on our analysis, we recommend:

Key Findings and Recommendations

Different sectors of Ireland’s economy face varying levels of risk from material criticality:

Key Findings and Recommendations

The criticality landscape is not static. Several factors will shape future material criticality for Ireland:

Explore the Complete Materials Database

Access detailed criticality assessments for all 42 materials analyzed in our study, including comprehensive
supply chain risk evaluations and economic importance metrics.